(You might want to grab a cup of tea for this one.)
As one of my favorite researchers, Michael Tsarion likes to say, “You’ve been sold a lie and, worse yet, you bought it!”
Yep, the Truth just might shatter YOUR be-lie-f system. Do you want the whole Truth or only that which doesn’t run headlong into YOUR beliefs / programs?
The global cabal is nothing new, not a couple centuries old, not something just since Albert Pike and the Robber Barons. It’s older than humanity itself.
For those of you who know today’s current global cabal and have got their number, wrench your minds and hearts open BEYOND YOUR OWN PROGRAMMED BELIEF SYSTEM and you will then see that the cabal’s fingerprints are ALL OVER the entirety of the history of humans. Period.
Yahweh, ya know, “God”, no it’s the “god” of the Old Testament, is the yahoo who is the beginning of the global cabal! These are the entities that the global cabal answer to and work for. These entities created humans to be a slave race and hence were here before humans.
But folks, they only created your human form, but you are spirit having a human experience, you are a soul of God. Time to remember who you truly are and take back your Divine Sovereignty and graduate beyond this 3D Earthly realm, to step out of the enslavement that the human form was created for and ascend that form to a higher dimension… literally. There is really nothing “wrong” with your human form, nothing “wrong” with physical realms and ex-periences. Yahweh’s ilk did make being human a bit of a challenge (that you as a soul signed up for when you came here) but all the pieces are there and yes, you can become Balanced, Whole and INtegrated, be your True Self as a soul and also still have your human form. That’s quite achievable in 3D / 4D and you’ll need to do just that in order to ascend to 5D, but dwelling in 5D will mean a whole lot less “have to’s”.
Read this blog to understand how you can help save the human form (and hence the human race) by saving yourself and ascending to the 5th Dimension / Density. This is what these times are about and what the global cabal so desperately don’t want you to know about… but that’s the role they have played in this Grand Ex-periment. They’ve done much over time to put you to sleep. Now they’re doing much to wake you up… as they expose themselves… by fighting tooth and nail to maintain their control over humanity.
It’s time for a Planetary and Collective Human Ascension. Graduation time.
This is an excellent article called “Is Yahweh an Anunnaku?” and what this post of mine centers around:
There’s a further wealth of info there in the epilogue, appendix and other appends. 🙂 I strongly encourage you to go read that stuff after reading this post.
Some comments on the info in the epilogue:
I see what is expressed as “angelic levels” to be what many of us call dimensions or densities.
“Yaldabaoth hence puts a lid over us with this “tree”: everything above him is taboo, everything with and below him is allowed. That is his world without the true God, analogous to the Anunnaki turning away from the prime creator pair to establish their own fake world without them.
Is it this very insight, this knowledge, which will make us free?! That Jesus wanted to give us and for which he, therefore, had to die?”
I’ve said that if you consider the word “sin” to mean ignorance, you’ll have a better idea of what is meant. I have spoken about that if there were a true “original sin” it would be the original ignorance of not knowing that you as a soul are a Divine and Powerful Creator God. When you incarnate here, you forget who you are. Reader and commenter ThankYourMuse had said this interpretation of sin meaning ignorance also makes sense of “Jesus died for our sins”, yes, for our ignorance. See info later (below in main part of post) about the archetype Prometheus, who was tortured for giving Truth to humans.
“It will not be a coincidence that Yaldabaoth (Yahweh / Anu) came to be, but a preparation for the exodus of souls from God’s light world.”
This has to do with us – and God ex-periencing through us – actually wanting to have these EX-periences. Ex = outside, hence, living outside of our True Selves, to know not only Light but darkness, not only Truth but ignorance, not only Love but fear, not only Peace but chaos, not only Abundance but lack, not only Joy but misery, etc. What is not truly us is an illusion. But the EX-perience and the growth and learning that come from that illusion are very real.
As this epilogue states, there was some ignorance involved by “higher level gods” building up to humanity’s EX-periences, which would be necessary for anyone at any level in order to go along with this grand EX-periment. It also takes ignorance to have free will, as you can read further about in my post Free Will is Just a Veiled Consciousness State . If we were all aware of only Light, Love, etc. as we are in “God’s Realm”, if you will, then we’d never exercise our “free will” and hence would not have EX-periences, as we and God obviously desired, crazy as we all are. Brave and frickin’ crazy.
“Also the archons have their Epinoias, but its light is deeply hidden in them. At the end they shall also find there (sic) way out of the darkness, even Yaldabaoth (a power, who according to Goethe “…always wants the evil, but as and end result yet creates the good”, that is: the souls that become free when their light-Epinoia is sufficiently awaken – illumination).”
Epinoia = Intuitive perception, divine revelation.
Archons – think the global cabal and the ETs they answer to. Yep, they serve the darkness which ultimately serves the light and helps to reawaken souls to who they really are.
And also see the Conclusion to the article… essentially, what’s ultimately called for is forgiveness. Yep, even of the global cabal and their ET masters. “Forgive them God, they know not what they do.” For you see, they too are veiled. And darkness is an illusion. All a Grand Ex-periment, that yep YOU SIGNED UP FOR! And re-member… forgiveness is for the forgivER, not the forgivEN. You release and free YOURSELF by forgiving. See more on that in Useful Healthful Tips .
Keep in mind throughout – No one can truly take authority over your life, but you sure can give it away. Humanity, in their veiled-consciousness state, gave authority of their lives away. Time to reclaim your Power folks. Re-member, Power and Responsibility go hand in hand. If you want your Power, you’re going to have to take Responsibility (the ability to respond) for your own creations. You have to OWN your own creations. That means your life and reality, both individually / personally and also your role in the collective reality. Yep, humanity, it’s time to grow up and be big boys ‘n girls.
I’ve known this sort of information for many years.
I have cut ‘n pasted the main body of this article below so that I could insert my own comments here, seen in red.
I bold AND italicize the portions from the article to which I am referring. If it’s only in bold, that is the article’s author’s highlighting.
I wrote my bits as I was reading and you’ll see that I sometimes say something that the author later said so please excuse me for repeating what they said… before they said it.
Who is Yahweh?
His name is actually written with only the consonants YHWH. In the Hebrew writing the vowels are, if at all written, marked with diacritics (additional signs), which is never or only rarely done with YHWH. The reason may be that according to old tradition his name should not be pronounced. One therefore talks about him in indirect ways, such as Adonay = “the Lord”. For this reason the vowel signs for ADNY are used also for YHWH. This would actually lead to Yahowah, but it became Yehowah. Why is that? One reason for the “e” could be that Yehu is an alternative name for him (and apparently one that may be pronounced). The more proper pronunciation will, however, be Yahweh.
Yehu, meaning “Yahu is He”. Ha! I always call idiotic and unruly ETs “yahoos”. Uh huh. There’s the Divine giving Mini Me a clue, ‘cuz that’s how these things work. I had a hunch that yahoo and Yahweh were related. Yep.
Recent discoveries of ancient texts and inscriptions  show that the archaic Hebrew religion knew a highest god ’El ‘Elyon (the sign ’ is in transliterations used for the Hebrew letter ’aleph and ‘ for the letter ‘ayin), who had 70 sons. One of his sons was Yahweh, who had a consort ’Asherah, i.e., a goddess. Her name is mentioned some 40 times in the Old Testament but it is almost always translated as “grove” or “tree”. This is because her symbol is a tree or and upright wooden pole. So when the Old Testament states that it is forbidden to plant a tree at the altar of Yahweh it really means that it is forbidden to place a symbol of ’Asherah there (Deut 16:21 – and what sense would it otherwise have to forbid planting a tree there?). Has Yahweh even rejected her?
Only 70 sons? I’d say then that the archaic Hebrews’ “highest god” ’El ‘Elyon is STILL NOT God / the All That Is / Prime Creator, but just some higher level little “g” god and that is how this article shows it also – little “g”.
Tree symbol. Have you noticed how every time there is some mass killing and you have reason to think that the global cabal are behind it, they always want to make a memorial and one of the things at the memorial is often a tree? Hiding the Feminine in plain view. They get to use the power of the Divine Feminine, but YOU don’t!
Has Yahweh rejected his consort ‘Asherah? Is this about hiding the Divine Feminine… in order to create an imbalanced – and easily controllable – patriarchy?!
The true creator god, the prime creator, was therefore not Yahweh, but ’El ‘Elyon. He has obviously created a number of secondary gods as his “sons” – better: deities – of which Yahweh is one (and, of course, also the “daughter” ’Asherah). Hence, Yahweh is not the prime creator he wants us to believe that he would be, even though he has also produced certain creations. We recognize a noticeable parallel to the Babylonian creation story Enûma Elish. This tells us about a prime creator pair Apsû and Ti’âmat (who we, in a way, could also regard as the male and female side of the prime creator, resp.), who created a number of deities, from which further deity races arose. One such deity race is the one of the Anunnaki (so called because their ruler and leader is named Anu). They separated themselves off from the prime creators and wanted to live and act without them. Enûma Elish tells about a murder of the highest gods. The Anunnaki are told to have killed first Apsû and then Ti’âmat! Is it possible to kill the prime creators? Of course not! This merely symbolizes that they turned away from them and didn’t want to have anything to do with them, as if they were dead – that was the fall, the plunge out of the divine light into a relative darkness. Therefore, the Anunnaki are fallen deities. The one who is said to have murdered Ti’âmat is Marduk who also became the lord of the Earth. The Anunnaki have under his rule created new human beings on our Earth by means of genetic manipulation, and from them to-day’s humanity arose. The first attempts for this were not very successful, but then they had the new race they wanted to produce.
The “sons” and “daughters” of ’El ‘Elyon, including all of you and me, absolutely ARE gods / creators, but we’re NOT Prime Creator (and obviously neither are any of these little “g” gods being spoken of – not Yahweh and his ilk and not ’El ‘Elyon, with only 70 sons).
We are though PART of Prime Creator. I have always LOVED the term Prime Creator for the All That Is because of its implications – we are ALL gods / creators. Creatures and Creators all in one.
A fellow lightworker had said that it’s not arrogant to think you’re part of God, it’s arrogant to think you could ever be separated from God. And THAT is just exactly where Yahweh was coming from, he shunned God and then claimed to be God.
It’s asinine for someone to worship a past Christ because that is one soul worshiping another soul – the right hand bows to the left hand sorta thing. It’s actually almost as silly to worship Prime Creator because we are part of Prime Creator – the hand bows to the head or heart sorta thing. But since EVERYTHING is, ya know, part of the All That Is (duh), then it serves to HONOR AND RESPECT All That Is, everything, everyone. Best to start with oneself and expand out from there. “If ya can’t love yourself, how the hell ya gonna love somebody else?”
God / All That Is / Prime Creator though is the perspective of all perspectives, literally. So, yeah, the wise person bothers to utilize their DIRECT Divine Connection and go straight to God and draw on that higher perspective.
See my later comments on the Anunnaki’s genetic engineering.
Correspondences with the Bible
The first sentence in the Bible reads, in the common translation: “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth” (Gen 1:1). The Hebrew word that is here translated as God is ’Elohim. It is a linguistic fact that cannot be denied that this word is a plural and hence means “gods”. It has been tried to explain this away through declaring it as pluralis majestatis, which actually doesn’t seem to be common in Hebrew. It rather looks as if one is trying to sweep an embarrassing question under the carpet.
In Hebrew, the sentence is: Bere’shit bara’ ’Elohim ’et ha shamayim ve-’et ha ’aretz. Therefore, some want to translate it as: “In the beginning the gods created the heaven and the earth”, but this doesn’t fit, since the word bara’ = “create” is in singular. Furthermore, the word for “heaven”, shamay, is also in plural: shamayim. However, the problem has a solution.
According to cabbalistic sources, the word bere’shit means not only “beginning”, but also “the first one”, the “original one”, the first entity that was, the highest God. The little word ’et could be seen as an accusative particle but can also be translated as “with” (in ve-‘et the word ve means “and”, hence: “and with”). We now arrive at the following translation, which fits grammatically: “The first one created the gods [together] with the heavens [cosmic worlds] and with the Earth”. This translation, therefore, refers to a prime creator, who first created “gods” and cosmic worlds, of which one is the Earth. According to Gen 2, Yahweh is one of these gods, one of the ’Elohim (since the Bible here calls him “Yahweh ’Elohim” in the Hebrew text, and not simply “Yahweh”). Some regard the ’Elohim as creator gods, who (themselves created) in their turn created other entities – human beings, animals and plants, like Yahweh did.
How I’ve heard this story is thus: Anu (Yahweh) was the leader of the Anunnaki. They came to Earth to mine for gold. Anu left his two sons, Enlil and Enki, here in charge. Enki was a genetics engineer.
Yep, Enki created what we have come to know as homo sapiens. He used a local hominid’s DNA (like homo erectus or cro-magnon… or whatever was around then) and also their own Anunnaki / Reptilian DNA.
His genetic engineering explains what some call “the missing link”, which means the archeologists see some kind of hominid (perhaps more than one) living here on Earth and then suddenly out of seemingly no where there is evidence of a new hominid (homo sapiens). Yep, their / our human form was not a product of a slow evolutionary process but a product of genetic engineering.
The conventional and “dogmatically approved” translation of bere’shit is based on be = “in, at” and re’shit = “beginning”. However dictionaries (such as ) state that re’shit can also mean “the first (of its kind)” and be can be a reference to the “origin”. Therefore, the word bere’shit can also be understood as a somewhat tautological expression for “the original first”, “the very first” or “the first of all”. A cabbalistic interpretation is that the word is a combination of beyt = “house, residence” and re’sh = “the supreme, the lord” placed inside beyt (between be and yt). This is then interpreted as “the lord in his residence”.
In a more exact transliteration is bere’shiyt and re’shiyt, resp., and thus one can say “between be and yt”. In -iyt, however, the letter y (actually being a consonant) phonetically marks the prolongation of i and therefore the more common (but less exact) transliteration is bere’shit. More exactly then with a stroke over the i that marks the length: ī.
There are some more peculiarities in the sentence. If one still wants to translate as “in … beginning”, it should more literally be “in a beginning” rather than “in the beginning” (because the latter would be bare’shiyt – a contraction of be-ha-re’shiyt – and not bere’shiyt). This seems to make little difference, but the word is actually written in an undetermined form as if there could have been more than one beginning (like “in one of the beginnings”). Or it could be a genitive, like “beginning’s” or “of the beginning”. This again makes little difference, but in this case, the word “create” would have another grammatical form . Such little peculiarities also disappear if we accept the cabbalistic explanation that bere’shiyt actually can be understood as “the first one”.
Plurals in the Bible
First, we note that the Bible has two stories of creations of human beings. In Gen 1 it is stated that the gods – the ’Elohim – created humans in their image. Here the plural is obvious: “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness … So the gods [properly translated] created man in their own image … male and female they created them” (Gen 1:26-27). This, furthermore, means that the woman was created equivalent to man. They should reproduce diligently.
In Gen 2, we come to the second creation of humans. Here we meet Yahweh ’Elohim – hence one of the gods named Yahweh – who first created Adam and then Eve. He obviously makes his own creation and he forbids Adam to eat from the “tree of knowledge”. The two must later leave Eden and Yahweh ’Elohim said: “Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil” (Gen 3:22).
Second creation of humans? There is more to this than just creating a man and a woman.
Hopefully my memory will serve me here, but you can do your own research anyway…. Michael Tsarion tells that Enki actually created not one but two Adamic races.
Enlil had wanted Enki to create a slave race since those from their own ranks (other Anunnaki) went on strike and didn’t want to mine for gold anymore. Enki’s first creation was highly intelligent and didn’t go for that slave crap. There’s reason to believe that this first race was androgynous or hermaphroditic. And the “in our image, after our likeness” thing may indicate that the first Adamic race may have looked VERY reptilian… like their creators… keep reading. But as this author also shows, the split gender thing for the second agamic race, homo sapiens, may be how we “resembled” the Anunnaki.
As you will read about in this article also, but the author may have a slightly different take from what I’m saying here, but it’s all interconnected… there is reason to think that the Anunnaki (or some entities who were fed up with them) may have destroyed the planet Tiamat, the remnants of which are the asteroid belt. Some think Tiamat was a very watery planet and has been referred to as “the life giver”, so there is reason to think that there was life there, including higher level life forms. Some think Mars used to be the / a moon of Tiamat. In that calamity many souls were released in a very traumatic way. Some think that Enki actually wanted to create a race for those “lost” (trapped in this solar system) souls to incarnate into. Some think it was out of compassion, but it may just be that Enki was aware that there were trapped souls around and knew they would then inhabit his new creatures… which sounds like may not have pleased his father Anu and his brother Enlil.
But, yeah, the first Adamic race didn’t go for the slave bit, so, Enki was back to the drawing board and his second Adamic race, homo sapiens, had the genders split and also the brain now had two hemispheres instead of being contiguous. The split into two brain hemispheres, amongst other things, essentially “dumbed down” the new race.
And… “They should reproduce diligently.” Go forth and multiply. Yep, get t’ busy making us more slaves, thank you very much.
“In our image.” And yet there shall be no “graven images” of “God”. Graven means engraved. The ETs didn’t want future generations of humans to know what they looked like. Humans / homo sapiens DO NOT LOOK LIKE the ETs who created them. These humans / homo sapiens obviously more closely resembled their local hominid genetic component than their Reptilian genetic component. So to interpret “in our image” in that way (that humans LOOK LIKE their creators) is not accurate, but consider that “image” is the root word of “imagine / imagination”. They made humans from their imagination. Indeed. Enki was a genetics engineer.
Also, as this author points out, Yahweh and company played down and hid the Divine Feminine, which IS one’s connection to God. So… graven images, whether pictures or sculptures are a right-brain / intuitive / Divine Feminine thing so in Yahweh’s warped world, that was not to be. On the other hand, as Leonard Schlain spoke of in his book “The Alphabet Vs. the Goddess“, alphabetic languages are left-brain, linear-sequential and help to reinforce the patriarchy. Leonard Schlain had done much historical research and realized that many cultures down through time went from having goddesses or both gods & goddesses to tearing down goddess statues. He realized it happened after the culture took on an alphabetic language.
Now, at a SOUL level, we are absolutely in God’s / The All That Is’ / Prime Creator’s image, in this case both in God’s imagination and also we resemble God – we are Powerful Creators, just like God. We’re part of God. Why would we not be Powerful Creators?!
If we assume two creations of humans (which the conventional theology apparently doesn’t want to do), this also explains something in Gen 4 that would otherwise be a riddle. There obviously already were people of the first creation outside of Eden, to where Adam and Eve had to go. Cain killed Abel and Yahweh said: “…whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold” (Gen 4:15). Who would else be there to possibly kill him? Then Cain took a wife and had a son with her, etc. From where did otherwise these women come?
There were two Adamic races! The first race, or at least someone from the first race went to “Eden” to tell the second Adamic race, the Adams and the Eves (there were more than just one of each) that Enki had created themselves (the first race) as a slave race and that was the Anunnaki’s intentions for the Adams and the Eves also, that they were Enki’s next try at creating a slave race.
The first Adamic race was literally the “serpent in the garden” and since then serpents and snakes have been given a bad rap and that first Adamic race, who were just attempting to warn the second of their fate, were villified… by “Yahweh” / Anu.
The Serpent was not there to mislead the Adams and Eves but to warn them of who WAS misleading them. The Eves were more naturally intuitive than the Adams so they knew that the Serpent spoke the truth and they had to work on getting that through the Adams’ thick skulls. The Eves caught a clue. The Adams may not have even been quick enough to catch a cold, beasts that they were. 😉 To this day, the Bible thumpers who are STILL duped by Yahweh have the audacity to say that it was “Eve” who was misled. *shaking head* As I’ve said, ignorance and arrogance often go together.
And… down through history, the men have thought that THEY are best suited to be spiritual leaders while, yep, they can’t catch a clue and dis their very connection to God / their intuition and dis the women who could teach them about it. *shaking head* An old friend of mine used to say that women are the conscious Unconscious, while men are the unconscious Conscious. Uh huh.
In Gen 18:1-5 Abraham is visited by three men – Yahweh together with two others. In Gen 19 Lot asks Adam about the three, who later destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. They will all three have been ’Elohim.
In many Bible passages, gods are mentioned in a context which gives us the following impression: there are other gods but you should stick to only one of them. The well-known command in Ex 20:3 (below) could be understood as a “non-competition clause”. There are in Exodus more relevant passages, such as:
“Who is like unto thee, O LORD, among the gods?” (15:11)
“Now I know that the LORD is greater than all gods…” (18:11)
“Thou shalt have no other gods before me.” (20:3)
“Thou shalt not revile the gods…” (22:28)
“…make no mention of the name of other gods, neither let it be heard out of thy mouth.” (23:13)
There is a large number of other examples in Ex 12:12; 20:5; 22:20; 22:28; 23.24; 23:32-33 and 34:14-16, in Num 25:2 and 33:4, in Deut 4:28; 5:7; 6:14; 7:4; 7:16; 7.25; 8:19; 10:17; 11:16; 11:28; 12:2-3; 12:30-31; 13:2; 13:6-7; 13:13; 17:3; 18:20; 20:18; 20:26; 28:24; 28:64; 29:18; 29:26; 30:17; 31:16; 31:18; 31:20; 32:16-17 and 32:37 as well as in many more passages in Joshua, Judges, 1Samuel, 2Samuel, 1Kings, 2Kings, 1Chronik, 2Chronik, Ezra, Psalms, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Daniel, Hosea, Nahum und Zephaniah.
Another remarkable part in the Bible is the mentioning of the “sons of God” in Gen 6:2 and 6:4: “That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose … There were giants (tyrants) in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Here again the Hebrew text has ’Elohim and “the sons of God” are, correctly translated, “the sons of the gods”. The text makes a difference between them and the humans. Hence, they were not humans. Were they half-gods? And the “giants” who were born from them, where they maybe quarter-gods?
This last paragraph I interpret as… the Anunnaki bred with their human creations (the Eves).
The Gnostic Christian view of Yahweh
In the early Christianity there were two mainstreams: the Paulinian and the Gnostic Christians. Saul had pursued Christians until he converted and became Paul. The year of his conversion is estimated to be between 33 and 35. The Paulinian Christianity began to develop only after that. Who were the Christians that Paul pursued? They will especially have been the so-called Christian Jews. This concept refers to groups among the earliest Christianity, to which belonged Jews who still adhered to Jewish customs – like Jesus and his disciples themselves. Out of these Christian Jews arose the movement of the Gnostic Christians. Because of his views, Paul cam into a conflict with this original Christianity . Hence, the Paulinian Christianity didn’t arise out of the original Christianity, and with Paul, who hadn’t known Jesus himself, an obviously modified Christianity began, that distanced itself from the Christianity close to Jesus that was in the beginning.
Saul became Paul – Ah yes, the cabal directive, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em” – infiltrate and corrupt! Saul / Paul did NOT convert. He was the beginning of the TRUE original Gnostic Christianity being hijacked!
My insert here – read at this link: “Jesus” is also not a real person, but a composite character. And this link.
One author of an article about this said, “The Jews kept waiting for a messiah so the Gnostics gave them one.”
A composite character based on what / who? First, based on many Pagan archetypes and allegories from many cultures throughout history, but also on the wisdom of the original Christians, the true Christians, the Gnostic Christians, the “New Agers” of their day, here to usher in the Age of Pisces, which is why “Jesus” is associated with the symbol of the fish – Pisces.
“Jesus” is not a real person, but an allegorical character. Doesn’t mean the story is a throw away. The character of “Jesus” told allegories / parables himself. Did you think the characters in his stories were real? Of course you didn’t. Do you think the stories are worthless because the characters in them aren’t real people? Allegories are meant to teach you something. They appeal to the right brain / Intuition / Divine Connection. It’s the same reason why the Pagans and Occultists have archetypal “dieties” that are NOT entities, they are ENERGIES, which have been personified so that you use your right brain / Intuition / Divine Feminine / Divine Connection to interpret them, not your “pea brain” / left brain / logic / reason / intellect but INTELLIGENCE, DIVINE INTELLIGENCE!
The original Gnostic Jesus Story most assuredly has its merits and I strongly suggest that if you really want to know / gnow (gnosis) the Jesus Story that you go to the original Gnostic gospels, NOT the edited version(s) that Constantine the Great and the Council of Nicaea put in the New Testament. They had a control agenda. Conversely, the Gnostics wanted you to reawaken to who you really are. They want you to know your own Christ Consciousness, achieve your own Christhood. That’s the last thing that cabal people like Constantine and the Council of Nicaea want you to know.
Yep, Jesus is just a character in an allegorical story, so it’s certainly NOT a story about Jesus. So, who is this story about then? It’s about YOUR potential. “Have I not said ye are gods? You too shall do these and greater things.” I hope to God you DO learn a little something from it. Find the Christ within!
For the Gnostics, the creator of this world wasn’t the true prime creator, but a demiurge, a “craftsman”, a fallen angel, who also has an evil side. While the real God, the true prime creator (who Jesus calls “father”) is unrestrictedly good, an imperfect demiurge created an imperfect world. It has been shown that the Gnostics identified this imperfect demiurge-“god” with the god of the Old Testament, who they also called Yaldabaoth, who wants to keep humans in a state of ignorance in a material world and who punishes their attempts to achieve knowledge and insight (to “eat from the tree of knowledge”). The demiurge is a lesser god who wants to be the only one . The text The Apokryphon of John (or The Secret Book of John) states: “He is impious in his madness that dwells in him. For he said, ‘I am God and no other god exists except me’, since he is ignorant of the place from which his strength had come” . (Cf. Ex 20:23 and Deut 5:7). Could this be the explanation of all the abominable cruelties, which after all are literally described in the Old Testament (see below)?
“creator of this world” Eh, this is a bit of a blending of things. There are many creators that create at many levels. I’d have to say – define “world”. If the planet is what is being talked about, well, that would be a higher-level creator god who makes planets, solar systems, galaxies, universes… perhaps.
Then as far as life in general on this planet goes, there were many ETs involved over much time at seeding and gardening the life on this planet. Then there were the Anunnaki who created homo sapiens through genetic engineering.
If “world” is not about the planet but is more defined like this: “all of the people, societies, and institutions on the earth”, then yeah, Yahweh had a lot to do with how things have gone here… since the creation and enslavement of homo sapiens.
“He is impious… ” This to me is what the word “hubris” is about. Some like to define “hubris” as someone who thinks they are a god… and that is “bad” in some way. Well, we ALL are gods. What’s wrong with a god thinking they are a god? Nothing! But when they don’t acknowledge that everyone else is also a god and there is a Prime Creator, yep, THAT would be “hubris.”
From Merriam-Webster – “English picked up both the concept of hubris and the term for that particular brand of cockiness from the ancient Greeks, who considered hubris a dangerous character flaw capable of provoking the wrath of the gods.”
Accurate. Other gods. I’d heard it said that “hubris” came from Greek theater and that hubris (as defined above) leads to nemesis – yes, the wrath of the gods. It ticks off the “other gods”. That would include humans also. Yep, Yahweh was a jealous god and was ticked that humans ended up with souls. Whah.
A similar view was expressed by Marcion (approx. 85-160) , the first theologian who made a difference between the God of Love in the New Testament and an evil god of the Old Testament.
The abominable cruelties of Yahweh
Who reads the Bible in an objective and unprejudiced way without blinders that fade out certain passages, will (or should…) become deeply indignant about the abominable cruelties  described therein.
The “lord” guides his people to the “promised land”, but that land isn’t free. People already live there in various towns. Therefore, the “lord” commands his people to mercilessly slaughter all of them. In nearly all cases not even a child, a woman or an old man is spared, but they should completely all be killed, so that his people can live in: “great and goodly cities, which thou buildedst not, and houses full of all good things, which thou filledst not, and wells digged, which thou diggedst not, vineyards and olive trees, which thou plantedst not; when thou shalt have eaten and be full” (Deut 6:10-11). With this, a veritable holocaust begins!
Gee, does any of this sound all too familiar – invaders from foreign lands urged to take over a “promised land” that they buildedst not?!!!
So the deceivers, Yahweh’s ilk, used the Hebrews to do this in history. Today, Yahweh’s ilk uses the radicalized Islamicists to do the same… amongst other migrants who are brainwashed and promised the world if they will just do Yahweh’s bidding, like oh, idk, voting Democrat perhaps? Don’t think that I am demonizing Democrats (the left) here. If you’ve been paying attention, I’ve been exposing the western religions (the right) for their control agenda throughout and now, in today’s world they are using mostly (but not entirely) the left to do so. The global cabal who ultimately answer to Yahweh and his people play both sides of politics, but lately the Democrats are being used more intensely and radicalizing and brainwashing migrants to invade the U.S. and Europe, to “take what thou buildedst not” and yet to hate and tear down the very things and concepts they are taking.
Are you starting to understand how Yahweh’s ilk and their “right of kings” mundane-level counterparts have and continue to use the western religions for divide and conquer?! It’s just “the left” doing it this time whereas it used to be “the right”. Is any of this getting through to you?! They really haven’t changed their bag of tricks, just put a new mask on it and duped another part of society. Hell, why even consider changing the tricks when they keep working?!
And so history continues to repeat itself as humanity refuses to realize this is just a broken record. “Oh, it’s ok if it’s ‘my people’ who are taking what we buildedst not… right? ‘Cuz, ya know, we’re God’s ‘chosen people’… right?”
What part of “ALL THAT IS” don’t you understand?! ALL is of God. What made you “special” in comparison to others and allows “your people” to get away with murder, rape, looting and pillage? Was it just the part that you’ve been duped by a “devil” like Yahweh who sold himself as God / All That Is? … but boy oh boy when that holier than thou crap is aimed at you and it’s YOUR stuff that YOU built and it’s taken from you, then you scream foul. WTF humanity?!
There’s not two cents difference between what Yahweh’s “chosen people” did and what the radical Islamicists are doing now. And yet there are Judeo-Christian types who have the audacity to point their finger at Islam… without researching the history of THEIR OWN religion.
Gee, maybe if everyone would bother to research THEIR OWN belief system and CLEAN OUT THEIR OWN BRAINWASHED PSYCHES, they would have gotten a much earlier heads up about this VERY SAME TACTIC being used yet again!
Furthermore, the “in here” / the Inner Causal Realms create the “out there” / the World of Outer Effects. You change “out there” by working on YOU!
When will you ALL catch on?!
More recently, now the cabal use atheist communist China to take what they buildedst not in the form of proprietary technology.
Same old tricks, just using different ways to go about it… again and again and again. Here are some key control elements and what these terms mean:
Religion (regulate – as in, your Divine Connection is being regulated),
Education (training – like with a pet, aka domestication),
Media (medium between / go between),
Entertainment (maintain in a certain condition),
Technology (systematic treatment).
They use anything and everything to control Earthlings.
In one city after the other, they murder and slaughter until no one is left. The only exception is in a few cases that they kidnap virgins. For what? It would certainly be naïve to claim that it would not be for sexual “services”.
When Moses by order of Yahweh could say as follows, he strongly disqualifies himself and his commissioner: “And Moses was wroth with the officers of the host… which came from the battle. And Moses said unto them, ‘Have ye saved all the women alive? … Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves’” (Num 31:14-18).
This rather looks like a mass human sacrifice for the “lord”…
For those who understand German I may suggest to read what the learned Karlheinz Deschner writes about this extremely blood-curdling common history of two world religions .
Obviously not just 2 but 3 world religions. ALL of which have had their egos boosted, being told THEY are “God’s chosen people” in some way or another… so go out and kill all the others. *yawn*
Persons who regard themselves as Christians like to suggest that the victims would be “evil” people who lived in “sin”, and don’t want to understand how they this way betray Jesus’ teachings. There can be no worse sin than to kill in the name of God (or of his messenger Christ)! And if one kills in the name of Yahweh, or by his order, this shows clearly enough that he cannot be the true god. Jesus taught us that who takes to the sword will be undone by the sword, and even to love our enemies.
When Yahweh rages as follows, he demonstrates his fake divinity: “And if ye walk contrary unto me, and will not hearken unto me; I will bring seven times more plagues upon you according to your sins. I will also send wild beasts among you, which shall rob you of your children, and destroy your cattle, and make you few in number; and your highways shall be desolate. …And when I have broken the staff of your bread, ten women shall bake your bread in one oven, and they shall deliver you your bread again by weight: and ye shall eat, and not be satisfied. And if ye will not for all this hearken unto me, but walk contrary unto me; Then I will walk contrary unto you also in fury; and I, even I, will chastise you seven times for your sins. And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.” (Lev 26:21-29)
The macho behavior began already before the exodus from Egypt. Yahweh sent Moses several times to the Pharaoh to request letting the Hebrews free. The Pharaoh repeatedly declared that he would do that, but Yahweh the each time hardened his heart so that he, after all, refused: “…for I have hardened his heart, and the heart of his servants, that I might shew these my signs before him” (Ex 10:1). Yahweh insisted in showing his muscles and have all the ten plagues come over Egypt before he would let the Pharaoh allow the Hebrews to go. At last, he went through Egypt and killed all innocent first-born! (Ex 11:5, 12:12, 12:29, 13:15) For what did he want to demonstrate all this cruelty? In a similar way he hardened the hearts of the Hivites (living in the “promised Land”) so that they should not try to make piece (sic – peace?) with the Hebrews but meet them in battle so that they would be mercilessly destroyed (Josh 11:19.20). Everyone should die!
We might estimate that on the average a woman (married or not – even some unmarried had children) had five children in those days. The guess may be reasonable. Of the five only one, of course, was first-born. This would mean that he killed something like 20 % of the population!!!
Another of the many cruel incidents is where Yahweh requests that Abraham kill his own son as a sacrifice for him. When Abraham is prepared to do it, Yahweh stops him and makes it look like a test of Abraham’s slavish obedience. And that is, of course, a test that displays Yahweh’s cruelty. If he had tested Abraham’s love, he would have to declare him as failed … because then Abraham should have strictly refused to do such a thing!
So who, then, are these Anunnaki?
The Sumerian texts tell about a planet Nîbiru that like a comet moves in a long-stretched elliptic orbit with a revolution period of 3600 years, and that that planet is the home of the Anunnaki. Hence, the planet during more than 3000 years is so far away from the sun that everything must be frozen there. How can they live in such a world?
The answer will be that they are multidimensional beings, maybe 5-dimensional. They are said to be of a reptilian nature. We are only three-dimensional, i.e., we can only perceive three space dimensions and think only three-dimensionally. It seems that the Anunnaki have made us this way so that we should not perceive them, unless they appear in there three-dimensional form. This form (their three-dimensional body) is in the long period when the planet is far from the sun – apparently during more than 3000 years – in some state of hibernation, and then they act in other dimensions, invisible to us. In times when it is closer to the sun, they have visited us in their three-dimensional shape and that is told about in the Sumerian and related clay-plate texts. During other times they, however, influence us invisibly from the other dimensions and want to control how things are going on our planet and manipulate us their way, in politics, in a controlled science (leaving out things they don’t want us to know) and in business.
They, of course, need life energy. They could have had it from still higher dimensions, but they instead take it from us and want to keep us as a kind “milking cattle” for such energies, but without us being conscious of it. We shouldn’t know what is going on. Why do they do it that way? The answer will be that they separated themselves off from their divine origin – they “killed” the prime creators. Hence, they cannot expect to get energy from there. They love brutality – fight, war, violence, bloodshed and violent death. Why that? When a human being dies violently, his body is normally still full of life energy (his “batteries are charged”). This energy is released at the time of death and the Anunnaki can gather it. But when someone dies wasting away or in old-age weakness, there is hardly any energy left to “harvest” (his “batteries are empty”). It furthermore seems that they enjoy animating us to violence and war, like when a child plays war games with a computer. They have for this reason put aggressiveness in our genes, but also character traits like obedience to superiors and easily feeling fear. To have fear, especially fear of death, is an effective means for manipulation. When we feel rage and hatred in aggressions, we unconsciously also set life energies free, and we do the same when we have a strong fear. Obedience makes us more easily manipulated to do things we really don’t want to do.
In my Power of Words… post I talk about how humans are encouraged to be “humble” or exhibit “humility”, both of which literally mean “lowly”. That’s how the Anunnaki view humanity.
It should also be mentioned that they (being multidimensional beings) will know quite well what too few of us want to know: that there actually is no death. Only the body dies, but the soul is immortal. This doesn’t make things they do less cruel … but rather becomes a bad excuse. I wonder if it might not be the karma for many of them to become real “milk and slaughter cattle” after the end of their long lives …
We, however, get our life energy from above, through the light of the sun, since we have not intentionally and consciously cut off ourselves from that energy flow (yet we are not conscious of what is going on). The light energy is absorbed by plants that we eat, and we also eat animals (unless we are vegetarians) who have eaten plants and absorbed energy from them. So we indirectly do feed on energy from above.
Much of the archetypal information in the Bible has to do with satisfying Pagan religions to convert their followers. Paganism, to me, has to do with what I like to call “Being Earthlings… for Dummies.” Paganism acknowledges the sun and the planet and its seasons, etc., essentially the environment we live in on Earth, and astrology informs us of the energies we, as Earthlings, as influenced by. As I’ve said elsewhere, the word origin of pagan has to do with “villagers / country folk”, ya know, those who live on and work closely with the land and have to give a sh*t about the seasons for farming, hunting, and gathering purposes, etc. They are “in tune” with the planet they live on. These days the cabal still have the dumbed-down urban-dwelling “libtards” dissing the country / small town folk, making it sound like the rural folks are the idiots, when it is the urban dwellers who are completely out of touch with their planet, etc. and tend to have an SSDD (same sh*t different day) sort of existence – regardless of season or amount of daylight, etc., they do the 8 to 5, day in and day out. *yawn*
For more on what the present-day cabal have planned to literally block sunlight from the world see this video:
Mike Adams – Bombshell! Documents Show Global Engineering (terraforming!) Linked To Eugenics And Depopulation
Also read my post The Speed of Light = The Speed of Thought for more understanding of how Higher Light gets to us through the Sun and the Hidden Sun. This “blocking of the sun” thing is about more than just cutting off food supplies, it’s about literally cutting you off from God!
This explains why the Anunnaki allegedly have very long life spans, of the order of thousands and even tens of thousands of years. In the state of hibernation, their three-dimensional bodies don’t age.
I would venture to say that the Anunnaki don’t really have 3D bodies. They have higher-dimensional crystalline bodies, implying they have ascended at some point… then got “full of themselves” in all the wrong ways and love to lord that over 3D beings. I sense that they can slow down the frequency of their 5D crystalline bodies to be “in the physical” here when they choose to be.
I also get that they “mine for gold” to use for 3D-level purposes. I won’t venture a guess on what that would be.
I also am getting that Nibiru really doesn’t have much to do with them. I also get that Nibiru is now no where’s near this solar system.
This interpretation of the Sumerian and related clay-plate texts is, of course, another one than that of official science. Who, however, studies the original texts (of which translations are found in University libraries) will find that there are no real contradictions to such an interpretation. It is really possible, but official science denies it. Only few have dealt with the subject from this aspect, the best known being Zecharia Sitchin . My book Es begann in Babylon (“It began in Babylonia”)  also does so, but describes several things differently than Sitchin does – which means that I don’t agree to everything he writes, especially not the remarkable embellishment of the Anunnaki (a.o., Sitchin doesn’t discuss the “primary murder” of the creator gods Anû und Ti’âmat).
In this case, (God informs me) THIS Anû is referring to the Divine Masculine (as opposed to the biological father of Enlil and Enki) and Ti’âmat here represents the Divine Feminine.
And, astrologically, the planet Tiamat had Feminine energy and was destroyed, so that REALLY was a blow to Feminine energy in the Sol-ar system.
In the fall of 2007, a rumor was around that Sitchin would have been arrested. This later turned out to have (highly probably) been a hoax (or maybe an intent was cancelled and later denied). No one should be astonished that some by all means strive to refute him as a crank or a liar. As an example, there is a website that claims that the words “Anunnaki” and “Nîbiru” would be found nowhere in the clay-plate texts. But I have an academic treatise by an ethnological scientist in which these words are certainly found in the translations .
As concerns channeling, I am very skeptical, since it is hard to separate the chaff from the wheat, and there obviously is much more chaff than wheat. There is, however, a book that deals with these things of which I (rather exceptionally) have a good feeling: Bringers of the Dawn by Barbara Marciniak . The Anunnaki are there called “lizzies” (as diminutive of “lizards”), since they are reptilian.
I’m with this person – most channeled info is total garbage. Barbara Marciniak’s Pleiadian channelings are an exception. The “Ps” as Barbara calls them, very much resonate with me and they, through Barbara, have been awakening humanity to the Anunnaki and the global cabal for decades.
Separating the wheat from the chaff in the channeling realm obviously takes more discernment skills than most “lightworkers” / Dark Clingers can muster as they consume one channeled message after another like eating M & Ms out of a bag. Nom, nom. And even if they come across very good, useful, practical, true info they still don’t do anything with it, don’t live it, don’t be it… just on to the next channeled massage. I saw someone had likened this to “spiritual masturbation”. Indeed. Goodness sakes. Channeling porn. Addiction issues anyone?
There is much information that indicates that the Anunnaki still to day have a secret influence, especially through secret societies like Zionism and related associations, like the Illuminati and certain Masonic orders. In them, only very few chosen ones at the very top of the pyramid know about the Anunnaki connection, but the mass of people – also of members – is kept in ignorance. (I suspect that something similar since almost 2000 years holds for the Church.)
Freemasonry was what the Knights Templar morphed into after that fateful Friday the 13th when the cabal monarchies and the pope came after them. Knights Templar / freemasons were both leftovers from the original Gnostic Christianity. But in typical cabal fashion, the cabal “joined what they couldn’t beat” and infiltrated and corrupted the Masons. This started in earnest in the 1700s, one example being the Royal Society of Freemasons.
The “harvest” of life energies from humans and animals gives a sense to the cruel practice of sacrifice. Of course, the meat is of no use to the “gods”, but the for us invisible life energies are. This underlines the remark above that all the murdering in the Old Testament may be seen as a mass human sacrifice for the “lord”. Since this life energy is especially contained in the blood, this also explains the command for the cruel practice of letting an animal bleed to death that is maintained in certain cultures. The blood – rather: the life energy in it – is for the “gods”, only the meat is for humans.
There’s something to these stories of “vampires” down through history, albeit metaphorical. Doesn’t matter if there is something “special” to blood or not, these sick freaks THINK there is so their horrors go on. Just the torturous death of slowly bleeding to death releases energies that the “vampires” / Anunnaki and their global cabal counterparts can absorb and get off on. They do though also “get off on / get high on” the blood of tortured people and animals whose blood is then full of adrenaline. See this report for starters:
And who, then, is Yahweh?
Sitchin in one of his books  takes the question up, who Yahweh may be. Is he also an Anunnaku? He is visibly trying hard to show that Yahweh isn’t an Anunnaku, but the god of the Anunnaki. His argumentation is, however, not very convincing. In my book  I demonstrate that his reasoning can also be seen to demonstrate that Yahweh is Marduk, and that is something he certainly wants to deny. It is a question of the point of view. Thus, one can actually set up the hypothesis that Yahweh is an Anunnaku! And that he during their physical absence from the Earth is a kind of “governor” of the Anunnaki. This fits to what is stated above about his abominable cruelty, on one side, and on the other side the violent nutrition of the Anunnaki with our life energies. Does he supply the Anunnaki with such energies from the Earth during their hibernation?
Yahweh, then (together with two other, see above) had Sodom and Gomorrah (more correctly ‘Amorah) destroyed. There are indications that this could have been done by means of a nuclear explosions. Certain geological peculiarities in the area may be such an indication. This allegedly was done because the inhabitants of the cities were prone to sin. However, Sitchins understanding of the clay-plate texts claims that the Anunnaki in the area were operating a basis for space traffic with Nîbiru. One gets the impression that they wanted to destroy this and eliminate all traces before they at that time gave up their three-dimensional physical presence on Earth. Sinai would at the time have been a forbidden area for humans. And that is from where Yahweh came – he is in the history of religions described to be a war-god from Sinai ! The thing about “sin” may then rather have been an excuse … or the “sin” was being in, or too close to, the forbidden area (so that they knew about it, which others should not).
Or… was “sin” a shorted version of “Sinai” and twist and turn and mix it about and here were are today. See my points about the demonization of “demon” in Power of Words…to see one small example of how language gets corrupted over time.
It is written in the Bible that the lord let “brimstone” and fire fall on the two towns. The Hebrew word that is here translated as “brimstone” is gaphrit, which rather means “pitch” (bitumen or tar) and generally refers to “inflammable material” , which may well be connected with explosions. Lot’s wife became a “pillar of salt” when this occurred (Gen 19:26). She had hesitated, stopped and looked back, and thus probably was too late to find protection and security, so that her body instantly died and became white from the radiation. As concerns “sin”, rabbinic sources like Talmud and Tanach but also gospels mention hostility towards strangers and denying hospitality , but later interpretations want to see voluptuousness and especially homosexuality here. If the latter would be true: why should so many heterosexuals and even children be punished along with the others? Actually: whatever the “sin” may have been: why punish also all the innocent? Here we again come to the unjust cruelty …
Would this be akin to Americans and Europeans not wanting rabid, radicalized Islamacist animals allowed into their country… and the lefty / “liberal” (not hardly) mainstream media (msm) spin it as being hostile and denying hospitality? Perspective means a lot when looking at these old texts.
And who is Jesus’ God?
In the New Testament Jesus presents a divine father to us, who much more corresponds to our expectations of universal love and universal good. He also talks about the Holy Spirit, who by many original Christians and by the Gnostics was understood to be a female manifestation of God. God as the prime creator thus appears as male and female at the same time. The prime creators Apsû und Ti’âmat were described as a pair – prime God and prime Goddess. Could there be a connection between the Holy Spirit and Ti’âmat?
See my discussion of the Holy Trinity in Interpretation … of Stairway to Heaven where I talk of the “Holy Spirit / Holy Ghost” is really the Divine Feminine. But we can’t actually acknowledge the Divine Feminine if we’re trying to maintain the imbalance and dumbed-down-edness of a patriarchy.
Ti âmat and Holy Spirit – as I’d already said, both represent the Divine Feminine, which is our connection to Prime Creator / All That Is through our Intuition.
As far as interpreting Tiamat as a planet that was once in our solar system and was destroyed, astrologically, in this Dualistic universal realm, planets are either Masculine or Feminine energy and I certainly have every reason to think that Tiamat was Feminine energy and her destruction would have definitely messed with the Feminine energy in this Solar system.
It isn’t easy to reduce the God, about whom Jesus spoke and Yahweh to a common denominator. The following quotation from the Gospel of John may be mentioned hereto:
“Then said Jesus to those Jews …” (8:31)
“’…If God were your Father, ye would love me:
for I proceeded forth and came from God…” (8:42)
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do.
He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own:
for he is a liar, and the father of it.’” (8:44)
“Jesus” here, in saying “your father” is speaking of the “god” of the Old Testament, Yahweh. “Jesus” spoke of his own father vs. the “father of the Jews”. Two different “entities” here.
The icon of the “devil” – big, red, horned, hoofed, etc. – is not an actual entity, but was created by the Vatican to fear-monger. In many ways it disses Feminine energy, sex, Divine Connection. Devil spelled backwards is “lived”. Live spelled backwards is evil.
The WORD ORIGIN of “devil” goes back to “accuser” (also “slanderer”), just like the WORD ORIGIN of “satan”.
But if that (now societal meme) “devil” archetype could actually be applied to anyone, it would be Yahweh who was an ET who dared to portray himself as God / Prime Creator / All That Is… and yet Yahweh is who Jews, Christians and Muslims think is God. You’ve all been duped BIG TIME! … and it happened long ago… and your loved ones – parents, teachers and preachers – have passed on the disempowering, enslaving programs down through the generations to you.
You describe “the devil” in a certain way, but who did / does what you say “the devil” does is actually the god of the Old Testament… who you worship as God. *shaking head* Learn more about “the devil” / “Satan” / Lucifer here: Lucifer
The global cabal answer to and were trained by Yahweh and his ilk – they project their crap onto others. The cabal institution of the Vatican / the church created the icon of the devil to put their crap onto it. To make you miss the fact that the descriptors used for the devil describe the god of the Old Testament called Yahweh.
About whom did Jesus speak here? It can hardly have been Abraham, to which those he spoke to refer (8:39). The story of Abraham in the Old Testament gives no reason for that. It has been suggested that Jesus here spoke about Yahweh. One might object that the persons he spoke to probably were devoted to worldly things, materialists and in their true attitude servants of Mamon (the lord of richness). In that case, they were rather paying lip service in their belief. Is it imaginable that Jesus would speak about Yahweh as “the devil” or even “Satan”? The Greek text here has diabolos, which actually means “calumniator” or “defamer” and that would probably be a more suitable translation. That Yahweh isn’t the prime creator, but an anunnakian tribal god among others may in view of his undeniable cruelty even appear probable… Looked at it that way, the translation “calumniator” would fit.
Indeed. Calumniator = making false statements. That’s Yahweh, the yahoo, all over.
But quite generally: Did Jesus want to teach original truths and was he for this reason killed by means of anunnakian influence? Did one want to prevent an attempt to give truth back to people? Has one for this purpose infiltrated the Church when it became clear that the new teachings could not be abolished ? People expected a Messiah, who would liberate them from Roman rule – but maybe someone came, who would show us the way to liberation from the Anunnaki, and no one really understood him…
The cabal love the archetype of Prometheus and his torture / punishment… for what? For giving the Truth to humanity. Geez, can’t have that!
A hypothesis about Jesus’ mission and the Christianity
Against the background of these considerations I have come to the following hypothesis.
Jesus came from above, sent with a revolutionary message to humanity and born in the very area, where the Anunnaki had had their center. These still had an invisible influence over humanity from “behind the veil”. Jesus gradually brought people a truth, which these invisible rulers didn’t want them to know. His teachings about love, peace and spiritual as well as human independence were seen as a threat. Then he also in a cautious way taught that his “Father” isn’t the god they believed in. As it came that far, he had to die for it. The invisible ruler hoped that, with his death, his teachings would with time become forgotten. But it came to be differently.
As I’d said earlier there was no “Jesus” but this author seems to lean in the direction that there was. Nevertheless, what is being pointed to with the archetypal character of Jesus does indeed bring an empowering message that the cabal did not want out. What’s really being pointed to is an allegory of “Jesus” that the original Gnostic Christians put out, the Gnostics obviously being in touch with their own “Christ within”. As I said earlier, Saul / Paul (and other global cabal entities) pursued and killed Gnostic Christians, which there were many of and the Gnostic Christian message / movement kept growing.
But if the global cabal could wrap that all up in one character and then have that character crucified, they were “killing” the allegorical “Jesus” figuratively, metaphorically, symbolically, in the same way that they “killed” the creator gods Anû and Ti’âmat and tortured Prometheus from Greek mythology. It wasn’t a literal “killing” but a metaphoric one, yes, in hopes that the True Christian teachings that came from the Gnostics would fall by the roadside.
The “killing” both literal and figurative just never stopped with Yahweh and the followers of Yahweh in the form of “the Church”.
Check out the pretty much wiping out of the Cathars in the 13th thru 15th Centuries for daring to say that the Old Testament “God” was not the real God / All That Is / Prime Creator.
“Catharism (; from the Greek: καθαροί, katharoi, “the pure [ones]”) was a Christian dualist or Gnostic revival movement that thrived in some areas of Southern Europe, particularly what is now northern Italy and southern France, between the 12th and 14th centuries. “
“The idea of two gods or principles, one good and the other evil, was central to Cathar beliefs. This was antithetical to the monotheistic Catholic Church, whose fundamental principle was that there was only one God, who created all things visible and invisible. Cathars believed that the good God was the God of the New Testament and the creator of the spiritual realm. They believed the evil God was the God of the Old Testament, creator of the physical world whom many Cathars, and particularly their persecutors, identified as Satan. Cathars thought human spirits were the genderless spirits of angels trapped in the material realm of the evil god, destined to be reincarnated until they achieved salvation through the consolamentum, when they could return to the benign God.
From the beginning of his reign, Pope Innocent III attempted to end Catharism by sending missionaries and by persuading the local authorities to act against them. In 1208, Innocent’s papal legate Pierre de Castelnau was murdered while returning to Rome after excommunicating Count Raymond VI of Toulouse, who, in his view, was too lenient with the Cathars. Pope Innocent III then abandoned the option of sending Catholic missionaries and jurists, declared Pierre de Castelnau a martyr and launched the Albigensian Crusade which all but ended Catharism.”
The part about that I bolded – When the Catholic Church talks about being monotheistic, they are doing so in an effort to hide the Truth. What has been sold as “God” in the Old Testament was Yahweh, the ET. They are attempting to hide the fact that Yahweh is NOT God / All That Is / Prime Creator. The Cathars on the other hand are attempting to point this out. Yahweh was a “god”, little “g”, as surely as we all are, but he shunned the All That Is and portrayed himself as that.
Very interesting that the Cathars would be considered “dualistic” for merely pointing out that the so-called “God” of the Old Testament was NOT the All That Is / Prime Creator and hence not the God of the New Testament that the Gnostics originally spoke of through the allegorical character of Jesus. I see this as more the Vatican twisting of Truth. It was the Vatican that created the icon of “the devil”. Also Zoroastrianism may have influenced other religions, where Duality of “good” and “evil” and also the concept that God / All That Is / Prime Creator had some “evil” counterpart. Nope, no evil “counterpart” to God, just a little “g” god, psycho ET called Yahweh.
Concerning the Cathars referring to Yahweh / God of the Old Testament as “Satan”. I’d love to know if the Cathars themselves actually capitalized that. No such name. But the word “satan” means “adversary, accuser, opponent.” Yep, Yahweh and the global cabal who answer to him go out of their way to be that satanic energy to Truth, Feminine Energy, humanity in general. No doubt. And many Jews, Christians and perhaps Muslims also still think that Yahweh, the “satan” that he is, is God. Wakey, wakey time!
Pope Innocent III is known for saying, “Kill them all, let God sort ’em out.” This was in reference to the crusades against the True Gnostic Christian holdouts called the Cathars. The bulk of them lived amongst many Catholics who essentially said, “You’re not taking our Cathars!” who their Catholic neighbors knew were good people. Pope Innocent III essentially ordered the killing of Catholics just to wipe out the Cathars… just as the author of this article I’ve linked to, and cut ‘n pasted here, says happened in Sodom and Gomorrah… as history kept repeating itself because humans don’t wake up to the control agenda. Many “innocent” people – at least as far as the reason given for killing them – are killed in order for the cabal to kill off their enemies, which was anyone who dared speak the truth or may have known the truth. Pope Innocent III doesn’t sound so innocent.
I don’t agree with all Cathar beliefs but some of those beliefs obviously presented enough threat to “the Church’s” existence that the pope wanted the Cathars all dead. Nevermind that the “Catholics” essentially stole the Cathars’ name. Cathars mean “the Pure Ones”. The Vatican is anything but pure. Pure evil perhaps is all they are pure in.