… and related ways of duping, manipulating and oppressing humans that the global cabal have used… such as revisionist history.
Yep, just like Winston Smith’s job, in George Orwell’s “1984”, working as a reviser of history at the Ministry of Truth.
“Those who control the present, control the past and those who control the past control the future.” ~ George Orwell
Yep, if you have control over information in the present, you can change the way that people see the past. That then steers their creative energies in a certain direction and hence determines the future.
Hmmm… let’s start here… someone online said something that got me thinking. What I got out of it had nothing to do with the angle this person was coming from and yet a significant point came from what they asked.
So, the setting is this current world situation where cabal stooges (both the knowingly so and also the unwitting) use race-baiting as some of their latest “divide & conquer” tactics. There was discussion of race going on in some online forum and I feel that this person asking the following genuinely could not understand how we got from point A to point B on this. Yeah, I hear that.
So, what this person online said was something to this effect:
“Any European could tell you that Spanish people, i.e. people from Spain are white. How is it then that the “hispanic” suddenly become “people of color” when they are from the Americas / Latin America?”
Yes, why indeed would someone of Spanish ancestry be considered “brown” or a “person of color” and yeah, just because they were in / from “Latin” America (again relating back to Spanish)?
Now, there is certainly a bit of blurring of lines and meanings since many times “hispanic” refers to people who speak Spanish and yet that somehow gets blurred into an ethnicity in some way. Sorry, but if some blonde-haired, blue-eyed Scandahoovian were to speak to me in Spanish, I wouldn’t then call them “hispanic”… would you?
And yet, can any of us truly deny that there are plenty of Latin Americans who are not creamy white. Nope, they indeed are brown, which the cabal stooges with all their race-baiting / divide & conquer so love to point out… and yet these Latin Americans are repeatedly labeled as “hispanic”.
Do I really need to point out that their “brown” skin, in most cases, comes from American Indians of various tribes? Kind of a “duh” isn’t it?
And yet, even though we are constantly reminded of their “non-white” status, we also keep hearing them being called “hispanic” – the emphasis is on their European ancestry not on their American ancestry… which is what gives them the brown color. I guess the cabal stooges are kinda getting mixed up on all their deceptions and kinda giving themselves away. Yes, dear cabal, why ARE the “Latin” Americans “brown” and why don’t you ever reference THAT ethnicity? If they are purely Spanish, they would not be brown and if they are brown there’s more going on there than just pure Spanish… but we’re to call them hispanic. Obviously too many lies for the liars to keep track of.
Also, all this hubbub about sports teams having supposedly “derogatory” American Indian names… well, first, I sincerely doubt that most Joe Average American Indians even give a crap at all, let alone are offended by sports teams having American Indian referenced nicknames / mascots. Perhaps only “liberal”-college-educated American Indians have a beef with such.
But I’d like to make you all think about some things here. Ok, let’s just go with this idea that these team nicknames / mascots actually are derogatory in some way. Fine and well, then change the stinking names. But I’ve yet to hear of anyone actually proposing that those (supposedly) “derogatory” American Indian references be replaced with another American Indian reference that held them in a better light. Nope. No proposals of that… only of just ERASING any reference to American Indians.
Nothing new to that concept. See video I left in comments on America for more on how the cabal have done their best to hide / erase any evidence of American Indians even existing in some cases or being anything other than “savages” in other cases (and also some evidence of the Anunnaki being in the Americas).
Sadly, the brainwashing and revisionist history does seem to work. Here’s a story. About a decade ago, I met this person who is Puerto Rican. In our conversation, the Mayans came up. I said something about how the cabal have people thinking that the Mayans were all killed off or otherwise “disappeared” from the face of the Earth somehow. I said there are still Mayans in the world.
This Puerto Rican said, “Funny you should say that…” and proceeded to tell me… years ago, when they lived in Puerto Rico, they had a friend in Florida who wanted to move to Seattle and planned on packing up their car and taking the long drive. The Floridian asked their Puerto Rican friend if they would come over to Florida and take that long drive with them. Yep.
So they were driving through Montana and saw a sign for an Indian reservation. The conversation went something like this:
The Puerto Rican asked, “What is that?”
“An Indian reservation.”
“Indians? You mean like cowboys ‘n Indians?”
Laughing, “Well, yeah.”
“So what’s that sign for. Is it like a museum?”
Laughing, “No, that’s where the Indians live.”
“Where they live? But there aren’t any Indians anymore.”
“Yes there are!”
The Puerto Rican made their friend turn around so they could drive through the Indian reservation to see the Indians for themselves because they just couldn’t believe it.
They told me they had that notion – that there were no longer Indians in the world – put in their head as a kid and it stuck.
Here’s a story about King Tut, Tutankhamun, who could have been known as Tutanaton instead.
You see, the suffix to his name, the “amun” part had to do with the Egyptian pantheon of deities. This is where the term “amen” comes from. How many Christians would keep saying “amen” if they knew it was technically pagan? Ha, ha, ha.
The suffix “aton” had to do with “the one god”. I won’t say “the one TRUE god” because that is not what the whole “aton” thing was about.
Akhenaten (-aton), was a “Hyksos”, which in ancient Egyptian meant “rulers of foreign countries”. (See Michael Tsarion for more on the Hyksos.) The Hyksos basically invaded northern Egypt and performed a coup and Akhenaten became the Egyptian king. The Hyksos were the ones to introduce this concept of “the one god”, but they really didn’t care about the “one TRUE god”, no, it didn’t really matter all so much which one god it was. Their motive was to dumb people down. They did a bit of looting too of gold statues and such in the name of getting rid of the pantheon of deities.
Later, King Tut had pressure on him from both sides about which suffix to use on his name. This essentially had to do with how the Egyptians as a nation would view Spirit / the Divine.
King Tut, the boy king, even though young, obviously had a few things going for him. You see, he could understand the concept of one god (essentially the All That Is). That was no problem for him, but he argued that even if taking on this new concept of “the one god”, perhaps there was still a place for the pantheon of deities. Indeed there was there boy king.
The Egyptian pantheon of gods later morphed into Greek and Roman gods – our solar system planets’ names. Across the board, the stories of these gods provide Archetypal and Initiatory Rites information about the Earthly realm and the human experience. Much information on how to navigate this human, Earthly experience. There was indeed very valuable information for humans in the pantheon of deities and yes, it was the Hyksos’ desire to dumb-down and control the Egyptians that made them push their one-god theory.
The Romans and the Catholics, in the 4th century, through the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great and the Catholic bishops of the Council of Nicea did a similar number on the world when they put the Bible together. They looked to the entirety of the world’s recorded, documented information and produced just one book from it. You can bet the Lie of Omission is huge in regards to the Bible. It’d be kinda like in today’s world where Chris Cuomo from CNN is telling everyone that only the press can look at Wikileaks and no one else can – “Oh no, don’t look over there. We’ll tell ya all ya need to know. We’ll be your one source.” Yep, the Romans and the Catholics were kinda losing their influence / control and wanted it back so they made one book, and kinda like the Hyksos with their one god, the biggest part of this “one book” thing was that it was the only one that anyone was to be focused on. Don’t look at that whole world of information, no, only look at the one book that they want you to look at.
“Jesus” of the New Testament is a composite character, meaning that the stories are about more than one person but they are lumped together under the name of “Jesus” and you can bet that a lot of all of their life stories got left out. A whole lot of lie of omission there. In today’s world, especially in news reporting, people might call this “controlling the narrative”. Yes, sometimes the fake news people will just flat out lie, but their biggest tact at controlling the narrative is to just leave out information – more than likely EMPOWERING info – that they don’t what you to know about and also overly emphasizing other things, all to fit their control agenda.
The Catholics also hid away information about Duality and the Sacred Feminine / Sacred Masculine / Sacred Union by renaming the feminine aspect of the Holy Trinity as the “Holy Ghost / Spirit”. (See Interpretation … of Stairway to Heaven post for a bit more on that.) Yes, they hid the powers of feminine energy and also of sexual energy away from Joe Average but they kept it to use themselves. The Vatican is full of men, supposedly celibate men (obviously homosexual drug orgies don’t count 😉 ), but the cardinals dress in red – the “sexual bride” part of the Sacred Feminine – to bring energetic balance.
These days, the leftists keep trying to associate the whole white supremacy / KKK (Ku Klux Klan) thing with those on the right. Nope. lol I’ve heard some folks correcting this “stinkin’ thinkin’ ” as of late, but I’ll come at it from the direction I learned about it, and that was a lot of years ago and no, sorry, don’t have any handy dandy references, only a story. I’m sure God and Google can help you with the rest. And hey, I’m not responsible for “your” truth anyway, you are. 😉
The way it was presented to me was… way back when, when the KKK first started – contrary to today’s conventional thinking – they did not threaten, intimidate and kill only blacks. They did indeed do so with others also. So, then what did the victims of the KKK have in common? They were Republicans.
The blacks had just been freed and given voting rights. Many of them were drawn to the Republican party since it was more spiritual / religious as were the blacks themselves. Suddenly there was a hoard of new voters, created out of thin air, who were mostly joining the Republicans.
The Democrats were not happy and used some pretty nasty ways to work towards solving their new problem. Yes folks, the KKK came from the Democrats.
These are just a few examples of the Lie of Omission and other deceptions that have happened down through time that many folks still don’t know about and new revisions of history are obviously still going on in recent times.